An Epistemological Theory of Argumentation for Adversarial Legal Proceedings

Danny Marrero

Abstract


The rhetorical view (R) suggests that the goal of factual ar- gumentation in legal proceedings is to persuade the fact-finder about the facts under litigation. However, R does not capture our social expecta- tions: we want fact-finders to know the facts justifying their decisions, and persuasion does not necessarily lead to knowledge. I want to present an epistemic theory of argumenta- tion honoring our expectations. Un- der my account, factual argumenta- tion aims to transmit knowledge to the fact-finder.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v36i3.4720

ISSN: 0824-2577